Reaction False Confession Non-DNA and DNA Evidence - 275 Words

Reaction False Confession: Non-DNA and DNA Evidence (Other (Not Listed) Sample) Content: NameCourseTutorDateFalse ConfessionThe record reveals that most prison victims have been exonerated by non-DNA and DNA evidence, after being charged with serious crimes (Kassin 2017). The exoneration occurs after a long time of trying to frame the victims who are not really guilty of the crime. Records reveal that the victims fall into the police trap thinking that they are trying to rescue themselves. The detectives falsely convict the suspects and make them sign confessions of being involved in a crime that they have nothing to do with. They do this in many ways including giving the wrong results and hiding the right results.In the video, Daniel William being the first victim was interrogated and convicted to confess that he had raped Michel. After a long period of interrogation, Daniel finally agreed that he had been involved in the crime. The detectives pressured Daniel promising that they would set him free if he told them what they wanted to hear. After the thr eat of death penalty, he decided to sign a confession which was contradicting with the real occurrence. Joe, on the other hand, was accused of the crime after Daniels DNA did not match with the victims sperms. The police made Joe believe that he was guilty and he was part of the brutal crime (Follette, Richard , and Deborah 2017.Although the real killer was later found, the life of the two (Daniel and Joe) did not remain the same again. They have faced rejection since most people still see them as victims of rape and murder. False confessi...